RE: BGP problem

From: Michael Le (mmle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:25:57 GMT-3


   
Your route-map is blocking your two static routes out. It's allow 41.1.1.0
and 200.200.200.0 and nothing else. If you had those routes, I'm sure r3
would show that.

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Virnoche, Phil
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 5:07 PM
To: CCIE newsgroup (E-mail)
Subject: BGP problem

r3 (BGP 2) ---------------- r4 (BGP 1)
Prior to adding the filter1 out statement I could see both the static routes
on r4 at r3 when i issued an "sh ip bgp" command,.............
After adding the filter, and issuing a "clear ip bgp * " command and letting
the two re-establish, I get nothing at r3..... ideas?

R4:
router bgp 1
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 redistribute static
 neighbor 10.33.1.65 remote-as 2
 neighbor 10.33.1.65 ebgp-multihop 2
 neighbor 10.33.1.65 update-source Loopback0
 neighbor 10.33.1.65 route-map filter1 out
 no auto-summary
!
ip classless
ip route 44.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
ip route 45.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
no ip http server
!
access-list 1 permit 41.1.1.0
access-list 2 permit 200.200.200.0
route-map filter1 permit 10
 match ip address 1
!
route-map filter1 permit 20
 match ip address 2
 set metric 5
!

Philip G. Virnoche CCNA
Network Engineer - AT&T Wireless
phone: 425.580.5239
cell: 206.601.3134

"HAM AND EGGS - A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime commitment for a
pig."



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:41 GMT-3