From: Jerry Hutcheson (jhutches@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:11:02 GMT-3
Robert,
Looked at that already and could not find any routing loops. I believe it has s
omething to do with the connected interface on R3 being a VLSM, and not allowin
g that network to redistribute into IGRP. Still working on it.
jerry
At 04:59 PM 1/23/2001 +0000, McCallum, Robert wrote:
>I think I have encountered this before. When you do a traceroute do you see
>the packets looping about in every direction apart from the way they
>"should" go? I had an occasion when for some reason the default network was
>taking precedence over directly connected routes. The way I got around it
>was to use redistribute blah igrp subnets. This then redistributed all my
>networks that I required to be redistributed.
>
>Maybe this is completely way off at another tangent. If so, sorry!
>
>Enjoy!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jerry Hutcheson [mailto:jhutches@cisco.com]
>Sent: 23 January 2001 19:44
>To: Alan Basinger
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: OSPF/IGRP VLSM Question
>
>
>Alan,
>
>Currently R4 can see the network but cannot ping any addresses. Except its
>link to R3. The same with R3.
>
>jerry
>
>
>
>At 11:43 AM 1/22/2001 -0600, Alan Basinger wrote:
>>Can R4 see the major network that you redistributed from R1?
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jerry Hutcheson [mailto:jhutches@cisco.com]
>>Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 12:47 PM
>>To: Alan Basinger
>>Subject: RE: OSPF/IGRP VLSM Question
>>
>>
>>I have ip classless on all routers still having problem. I can get it to
>>work when I have to send a default route to R4 using the address from the
>>RIP network unfortunatley I have to summarize two addresses coming from the
>>RIP network. When I summarize them nothing seems to work.
>>
>>jerry
>>
>>At 08:45 PM 1/21/2001 -0600, Alan Basinger wrote:
>>>Have you made sure you have ip-classless on r3 and r4? I had the same
>>>problem when I forgot to turn on ip classless on R4 after using the
>command
>>>it propagated the default network to R4
>>>
>>>Alan Basinger
>>>Systems Engineer
>>>SBC DataComm
>>>Houston Texas
>>>abasinge@swbell.net
>>>
>>> | |
>>> ||| |||
>>> .|||||. .|||||.
>>>.:|||||||||:.:|||||||||:.
>>> C i s c o S y s t e m s
>>> Certified Gold Partner
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>>>Jerry Hutcheson
>>>Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 11:40 PM
>>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>>Subject: OSPF/IGRP VLSM Question
>>>
>>>
>>>I apologize for asking this question again. But I appear to have something
>>>wrong. I have a lab network that looks like this:
>>>
>>>R1 -------------------------
>>>R2-------------------------------------R3--------------------------------R
>4
>>.
>>>
>>>R1 is redistributing Rip into OSPF, the networks are 192.1.95.0/24 on the
>>>RIP side and 134.1.125.0/24 Area 1 on the OSPF side to R2. Then
>>> R2 is connected to R3 via OSPF using network 134.1.253.0/22 Area 0. All
>of
>>>this works fine and I can see the Rip network throughout all of my other
>>>routers. However I am trying to mutually redistribute from R3 OSPF into
>>>IGRP, the network is 134.1.34.0/24, as well as send a default route
>>>downstream to R4.
>>>
>>>I can get the default route to show up in the R4 routing table, but once I
>>>do this or attempt any redistribution commands I am unable to ping any of
>>my
>>>upstream interfaces from R3 or R4. I put in the area range command on R3
>to
>>>summarize the 134.1.253.0/22 network to a /24, and I used the
>192.1.95.0/24
>>>network as my ip default network so I would have a network outside of
>>normal
>>>address range. But I have had no luck being able to ping these upstream
>>>routers. I have been working on this for a couple of days and have tried
>>>some of the suggestions on this site but nothing seems to work. Any help
>>you
>>>can give would be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>>thanks,
>>>
>>>Jerry Hutcheson
>>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:41 GMT-3