Re: how deep.

From: Kevin Baumgartner (kbaumgar@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:29:23 GMT-3


   
I won't get too deep into stun or sdlc. I don't think it's even listed on the
CCIE protocols that are tested.

  I would be very familar with DLSW, SRB and SRT.
DLSW filters, DLSW border routers, backup,etc. There is quite a bit of
stuff just with DLSW that could be tested.

  Kevin

At 03:50 PM 1/23/01 +0100, Max Aronica wrote:
>Dear all,
>I really need your advise on this general item. You know how endless the
>networking things and cisco router capability are. Now, how deep do we have
>to go into the topics to be able to say "I feel prepared".
>I cannot imagine we are requested to know "all is configurable" on the lab
>machines, because I think nobody could. Take dlsw. If I had to go in every
>leaf, should I know how to support stun sdlc sdllc qllc pu2 pu2.1 pu4 pu5 ?
>And what about multicast. Cisco ftp is plenty of info, but how long one
>would have to stay on multicast to learn enough (11 pdf modules 1-2 Mb each
>!!)
>Sometimes I'd like to know where to stop, even because exam contents are so
>vague...
>
>What's your methodolgy on that? Maybe I'm failing in skipping something.
>Thank you very much,
>Max
>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:41 GMT-3