Re: OSPF Redistribution Challenge

From: Mask Of Zorro (ciscokid00@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2001 - 16:52:57 GMT-3


   
I never would have looked at this if it hadn't said at the end that the
answer was on the CD...

The great thing about this was not the challenge itself, but the fact that I
found the answer on the CD in about 5 minutes. I have become very familiar
with this tool of late, and this is the kind of scenario that puts it to the
test.

I knew right where to go for the answer, et viola, there it was... That will
really help when I get to the lab.

A good practical excercise might be for all of us to submit similar
challenges and see where they are on the CD. The winner will not only post
the answer, but the path on the CD where the answer can be found, so that
people can become familiar with how and where to look things up on the CD.
After all, the CD is all you've got in the real thing!

Z

>From: Mike McSpedon <mike@mentortech.com>
>Reply-To: Mike McSpedon <mike@mentortech.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: OSPF Redistribution Challenge
>Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:29:14 -0500
>
>Everyone,
>
>Bill was on the right track all along. He was advertising a conditional
>default under the OSPF process on r3 with 'default-information originate
>route-map <route-map-name>'. This will advertise a default if the match
>condition in the route-map is met.
>
>The reason Bill's first answer wasn't 100/% correct was because he needed
>to match a route from R2 his route-map to meet the requirements of the
>question. Anyway, Bill had the answer - so hats off to Bill.
>
>HTH,
>Mike
>
>At 11:06 AM 1/22/01 -0800, Bill Dellamar wrote:
>
> >Mike,
> >I was matching the serial link between R2 and R3. Oh,
> >crap, it should be 170.10.255.0 0.0.0.3 and not
> >135.9.192.0 0.0.0.3.
> >What I meant and what I typed were 2 different things.
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:39 GMT-3