From: Wayne Hu (wayneccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:42:18 GMT-3
or you can use
summary-address 199.172.0.0 255.255.252.0
this will put 199.172.1.0 and 199.172.3.0 in the same subnet 199.172.0.0/22
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Vikas Gupta
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 10:19 AM
To: Robert DeVito; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OSPF Scenario
Use this under OSPF process:
summary-address 199.172.1.0 255.255.254.0 ---(this
will actually match all odd numbers, 3rd octet i.e
1,3,5,7 routes)
This will take care of 199.172.1.0 and 3.0 routes and
send it as one 199.172.1.0/23 and 199.172.12.0/24 will
be advertised as-is.
HTH,
Vikas
--- Robert DeVito <robertdevito@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I have a scenario where I am redistributing RIP into
> OSPF. In the RIP
> network I have 3 routes,
> 199.172.1.0/24,199.172.3.0/24, and 199.172.12.0/24.
> I am asked to redistribute RIP into OSPF and
> summarize so that I am only
> redistributing 2 routes into OSPF. I have read alot
> about the area-range
> and address-summ commands. I am now getting a little
> confused. Can someone
> show me how would they tackle this problem??
>
> Thank you,
> RobertRobert DeVito
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:39 GMT-3