From: Robert DeVito (robertdevito@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2001 - 05:47:28 GMT-3
Everyone,
This is the way I ended it up doing it. Comments?
Router 7
!
interface Ethernet0
mac-address 0007.0007.0007
ip address 140.10.30.7 255.255.252.0
no ip directed-broadcast
media-type 10BaseT
!
interface Ethernet0.1
no ip directed-broadcast
ipx network 777 encapsulation SAP
!
interface Ethernet0.2
no ip directed-broadcast
ipx network 444
Router 4
!
interface Ethernet0/0
mac-address 0004.0004.0004
ip address 140.10.30.4 255.255.252.0
no ip directed-broadcast
ip ospf interface-retry 0
!
interface Ethernet0/0.1
no ip directed-broadcast
ipx network 777 encapsulation SAP
!
interface Ethernet0/0.2
no ip directed-broadcast
ipx network 444
Robert
----Original Message Follows----
From: Les Hardin <hardinl@bah.com>
To: "Robert DeVito" <robertdevito@hotmail.com>,ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IPX question
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 00:28:36 -0500
Robert,
No problem if you use two different encapsulation types. That's how we use
to do it in the "real world."
Les
At 05:22 AM 1/22/2001 +0000, Robert DeVito wrote:
>I came accross a scenerio that require to have two different novell network
>numbers on the name ethernet segment and maintain connectivity.
>
> R7
> | ipx network = 7
>---------------------
> |ipx network = 4
> R4
>How would you do this? The only thing I can think if is using two
>subinterfaces and defining network 7 and network 4 on each router..
>Thoughts?
>
>Thanks in advanced,
>Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:38 GMT-3