Re: No exec Vs Exec-timeout 0 0

From: John Bays (baysjohn@xxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2001 - 00:39:53 GMT-3

• Next message: Dave Martin: "Quick question on LS-1010's"
• Previous message: Thomas Trygar: "Re: No exec Vs Exec-timeout 0 0"
• Maybe in reply to: peter brown: "No exec Vs Exec-timeout 0 0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
At 10:23 PM 1/21/2001 -0500, Thomas Trygar wrote:
>'no exec' will disable exec mode (needed under line 1 16 to enable reverse
>telnet)

Common misconception above... Exec mode is NOT NEEDED on lines 1-16 (2511
or similar) to enable reverse telnet on your terminal server. The command
no exec IS RECOMMENDED for lines 1-16 to prevent line noise from affecting
your terminal server as inbound exec requests.

John

• Next message: Dave Martin: "Quick question on LS-1010's"
• Previous message: Thomas Trygar: "Re: No exec Vs Exec-timeout 0 0"
• Maybe in reply to: peter brown: "No exec Vs Exec-timeout 0 0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:38 GMT-3