From: Mike McSpedon (mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jan 21 2001 - 17:28:15 GMT-3
David is right. Classic mistake. Thought I knew the answer before reading
the question carefully.
-Mike
At 01:55 PM 1/21/01 -0400, David FAHED wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Fisrt if you read my last e-mail you will see I use the area range not on the
>ASBR but on a internal ospf router. Second I think that you don't
>understand how
>to use the summary-address. The summary-address can't be used on IGRP
>process, so
>you propose to use on the ospf process. The problem is if you use it on
>the ospf
>process, it will be useful to summarize IGRP route on the OSPF process. In
>this
>case we want to do the contrary (OSPF->IGRP).
>
>
>Mike McSpedon wrote:
>
> > Regarding the first approach - I'd be careful to do that only if the routes
> > in the OSPF domain aren't summarizable into a /24 (e.g., OSPF has a /20
> > that needs to be reachable from the IGRP domain). Regarding the second
> > approach, since Paige is an ASBR, you'll need to use the "summary-address"
> > not the "area-range" command to summarize the /26 and /28 into /24s for
> IGRP.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Mike
> >
> > At 08:05 AM 1/21/01 -0400, David FAHED wrote:
> > >There is two way to do that :
> > >1) Create a loopback on Paige for example 10.0.0.1 - Use the default
> > >network 10.0.0.0 to announce a default route into igrp process
> > >2) All the network with a mask differente to /24 use in the ospf domain
> > >have to be announce with /24. You can use an area range with the two
> > >route in gibson - for the route 172.20.113.192/26 area x range
> > >172.20.113.0 255.255.255.0 -for the route 172.20.114.48/28 area x range
> > >172.20.113.0 255.255.255.0 - After doing that you will have only /24
> > >network on paige and you can redistribute into IGRP without problem
> > >
> > >Hope this help!
> > >
> > >
> > >fwells12 wrote:
> > >
> > > > In Jeff Doyle's example of OSPF/IGRP redistribution on page 710, is =
> > > > there any way of letting the IGRP domain be able to ping the VLSM =
> > > > networks?
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:37 GMT-3