From: Mike McSpedon (mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jan 21 2001 - 12:33:40 GMT-3
Regarding the first approach - I'd be careful to do that only if the routes
in the OSPF domain aren't summarizable into a /24 (e.g., OSPF has a /20
that needs to be reachable from the IGRP domain). Regarding the second
approach, since Paige is an ASBR, you'll need to use the "summary-address"
not the "area-range" command to summarize the /26 and /28 into /24s for IGRP.
HTH,
-Mike
At 08:05 AM 1/21/01 -0400, David FAHED wrote:
>There is two way to do that :
>1) Create a loopback on Paige for example 10.0.0.1 - Use the default
>network 10.0.0.0 to announce a default route into igrp process
>2) All the network with a mask differente to /24 use in the ospf domain
>have to be announce with /24. You can use an area range with the two
>route in gibson - for the route 172.20.113.192/26 area x range
>172.20.113.0 255.255.255.0 -for the route 172.20.114.48/28 area x range
>172.20.113.0 255.255.255.0 - After doing that you will have only /24
>network on paige and you can redistribute into IGRP without problem
>
>Hope this help!
>
>
>fwells12 wrote:
>
> > In Jeff Doyle's example of OSPF/IGRP redistribution on page 710, is =
> > there any way of letting the IGRP domain be able to ping the VLSM =
> > networks?
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:37 GMT-3