From: BUI, TIN T (SBCSI) (tb4565@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jan 21 2001 - 01:21:50 GMT-3
I posted this a couple of weeks ago and everyone seem to think my
configuration would work, but after reading some more, I think I'm missing
the statement "source-bridge ring-group 200" on R5. Reason is that from R5
to R2 we are going from ethernet to Token ring. Did everyone miss this or
would this configuration actually work? I don't have the correct equipment
to test out this configuration so that's why I'm asking. thanks
Scenario: Configure R2, R4, and R5 for DLSW. Configure filter so that the
only protocol that is transported via dlsw is netbios and apply this filter
to R2 remote peer statements.
R5:
dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.100.5.5 group 100 promiscuous
dlsw bridge-group 1
int loopback 0
ip address 150.100.5.5 255.255.255.0
int e0
bridge-group 1
bridge 1 protocol ieee
R2:
source-bridge ring-group 200
dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.100.2.2 group 100 border
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 150.100.4.4 lsap-output-list 200
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 150.100.5.5 lsap-output-list 200
int loopback 0
ip address 150.100.2.2 255.255.255.0
int token0
source-bridge 25 1 200
source-bridge spanning
access-list 200 permit 0xF0F0 0x0101
R4:
source-bridge ring-group 400
dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.100.4.4 group 100 promiscuous
int loopback 0
ip address 150.100.4.4 255.255.255.0
int token0
source-bridge 26 1 400
source-bridge spanning
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:37 GMT-3