From: Santarsiero, Bill (BSantarsiero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jan 17 2001 - 11:31:56 GMT-3
To be technically correct, this is not an SNA access list. It is a netbios
access-list. Taken right out of ECP1, the answer is:
access-list 200 deny 0xF0F0 0x0101
SNA access lists use different SSAPs and DSAPs. If you need those, then
re-post.
Regards,
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Ali, Shahzad [mailto:Shahzad.Ali@ps.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 2:10 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: SNA Access-list
All,
Please verify this ???
To deny NetBios which mask is right 0x0101 or 0x0001 ?
access-list 200 deny 0xF0F0 0x0101 This one is right or
access-list 200 deny 0xF0F0 0x0001
access-list 200 permit 0x0000 0xFFFF
thanks
n
Regards,
ShahzaD
-----Original Message-----
From: Hardin Les - SMTP [mailto:hardinl@bah.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 12:36 PM
To: Barry J. Bocaner; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: DLSW MAC ADDR Filtering and Masks
All,
OK! All the research I've done points to 1 = care and 0 = don't care for
MAC address filters (at least on icanreach mac-address
commands). http:/www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/dlswfilter.shtml is clear
on this (page 10 and 11).
Does anyone dispute this?
Les
At 12:25 PM 1/16/2001 -0500, Barry J. Bocaner wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Robert DeVito wrote:
>
> > to verify this, if you use the command:
> >
> > dlsw icanreach mac-add 00c0.00c0.1234 and then press enter, it
> automatically
> > appends the ffff.ffff.ffff, which means to me, that 1 is "care" and 0 is
> > "don't care"
> >
>
>But it is not... don't ask me why the routers behave weird like that, but
>ffff.ffff.ffff means don't care. TRUST ME.
>
>
>--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Barry J. Bocaner
> Sr. Network Engineer TruEdge Technologies
> <barry@truedge.com> 703-573-9884 x 103
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:32 GMT-3