From: Wu Jiang (wujiang@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:47:41 GMT-3
Haven't read all the mails. Is this what you are saying?
ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/ipmulticast/autorp.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "Claude-Vincent" <claude_vincent@yahoo.com>
To: "Allyn Baskerville" <abaskerville@ibeam.com>; "'Brian Hescock'" <bhescock@c
isco.com>; "Robert DeVito" <robertdevito@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: auto-rp and frame-relay
> Allyn,
>
> I have just tried on my routers and I can see the RP. Please refer to the
> log info pasted hereby.
>
> hub#sh ip pim rp
> Group: 229.229.229.1, RP: 192.168.1.2, v2, v1, next RP-reachable in 00:00:58
> Group: 228.228.228.1, RP: 192.168.1.2, v2, v1, next RP-reachable in 00:00:56
>
> hub#sh ip pim nei
> PIM Neighbor Table
> Neighbor Interface Uptime/Expires Ver DR
> Address Priority/Mode
> 170.10.10.1 Serial0 00:17:07/00:01:25 v2 N /
> 192.168.1.1 Serial1 00:20:55/00:01:22 v2 N /
>
> hub#sh int se1
> Serial1 is up, line protocol is up
> Hardware is HD64570
> Internet address is 192.168.1.2/24
> MTU 1500 bytes, BW 125 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec,
> reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
> Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set
> Keepalive set (10 sec)
> LMI enq sent 34, LMI stat recvd 0, LMI upd recvd 0
> LMI enq recvd 358, LMI stat sent 343, LMI upd sent 0, DCE LMI up
> LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DCE
> FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down
> Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 390/45, interface broadcasts
> 478
> Last input 00:00:02, output 00:00:02, output hang never
> Last clearing of "show interface" counters 01:02:41
> Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
> Queueing strategy: weighted fair
> Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
> Conversations 0/2/256 (active/max active/max total)
> Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
> Available Bandwidth 93 kilobits/sec
> 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
> 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
> 1078 packets input, 49573 bytes, 0 no buffer
> Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
> 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
> 1069 packets output, 44155 bytes, 0 underruns
> 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 10 interface resets
> 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
> 30 carrier transitions
> DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up
>
> Spoke2#sh ip pim rp
> Group: 229.229.229.1, RP: 192.168.1.2, v2, v1, uptime 00:04:55, expires
> 00:04:05
> Group: 228.228.228.1, RP: 192.168.1.2, v2, v1, uptime 00:04:56, expires
> 00:04:05
> Spoke2#sh ip int brie
> Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
> Protocol
> Ethernet0 172.10.1.1 YES manual up down
> Loopback0 2.2.2.2 YES manual up up
> Serial0 192.168.1.1 YES NVRAM up up
> Serial1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
> Tunnel0 180.10.1.2 YES manual up up
>
>
> Vincent
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Allyn Baskerville" <abaskerville@ibeam.com>
> To: "'Brian Hescock'" <bhescock@cisco.com>; "Robert DeVito"
> <robertdevito@hotmail.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 1:12 AM
> Subject: RE: auto-rp and frame-relay
>
>
> > I have another question about how the RP is supposed to show up at the
> spoke
> > routers. The spoke routers receive announcements for the RP; however,
> when
> > I do a "show ip pim rp" the RP doesn't show up until after I ping a
> > multicast address. Then eventually the RP entry times out, even though it
> > continues to be announced. Is this to be expected? Thanks - Allyn
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Hescock [mailto:bhescock@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 10:11 PM
> > To: Robert DeVito
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: auto-rp and frame-relay
> >
> >
> > Also, one thing a lot of people don't realize, and could be a "gotcha", is
> > an RP learned via Auto-RP is preferred over a statically defined rp via
> > "ip pim rp-address" (assuming you aren't specifying "ip pim accept-rp to
> > filter which ones you'll accept as an RP).
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Robert DeVito wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone have any good examples of using auto-rp in a hub and spoke??
> > My
> > > understanding is that you need to have your MA on your hub and the
> > > rp-announce on your spokes? Am I close?
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:32 GMT-3