From: Raymond Cheung (rcheung@xxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:26:03 GMT-3
Your real world experience is WRONG. Please read the cisco link someone just
posted.
I got this wrong before, but just correct myself recently. If you type "?"
after dlsw icanreach macaddr xxxx.xxxx.xxxx mask, you'll see it says the
mask and the mac address will be ANDed. So for sure f means exact match, 0
means don't care.
HTH.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Patrick Bikar
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Barry J. Bocaner; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: DLSW MAC ADDR Filtering and Masks
Hi all,
I got this from a "real-world" config :
source-bridge ring-group 26
dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.28.0.110 promiscuous
dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive remote
dlsw icanreach netbios-exclusive
dlsw icanreach mac-address 4000.3726.0001 mask 0000.0000.0000
meaning that 0=cares and 1=don't-cares.
however, several white papers explains the contrary ...
I'm confused ...
patrick.
At 08:27 16/01/2001 -0500, Barry J. Bocaner wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Wu Jiang wrote:
>
>> In access lists, wild cast. In dlsw icanreach mac-address statement,
reverse.
>
>No! They are both wildcard masks
>
>--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Barry J. Bocaner
> Sr. Network Engineer TruEdge Technologies
> <barry@truedge.com> 703-573-9884 x 103
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:31 GMT-3