Re: DLSW MAC ADDR Filtering and Masks

From: Patrick Bikar (pbikar@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:40:15 GMT-3

• Next message: Connary, Julie Ann: "Re[2]: aggregate addresses and redistribution"
• Previous message: Bill O'Brien: "RE: Lab scenarios"
• Maybe in reply to: Bill Fallon: "DLSW MAC ADDR Filtering and Masks"
• Next in thread: Robert DeVito: "RE: DLSW MAC ADDR Filtering and Masks"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hi all,

I got this from a "real-world" config :
source-bridge ring-group 26
dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.28.0.110 promiscuous
dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive remote
dlsw icanreach netbios-exclusive
dlsw icanreach mac-address 4000.3726.0001 mask 0000.0000.0000

meaning that 0=cares and 1=don't-cares.

however, several white papers explains the contrary ...

I'm confused ...
patrick.

At 08:27 16/01/2001 -0500, Barry J. Bocaner wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Wu Jiang wrote:
>
>> In access lists, wild cast. In dlsw icanreach mac-address statement,
reverse.
>
>No! They are both wildcard masks
>
>--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Barry J. Bocaner
> Sr. Network Engineer TruEdge Technologies
> <barry@truedge.com> 703-573-9884 x 103
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>

• Next message: Connary, Julie Ann: "Re[2]: aggregate addresses and redistribution"
• Previous message: Bill O'Brien: "RE: Lab scenarios"
• Maybe in reply to: Bill Fallon: "DLSW MAC ADDR Filtering and Masks"
• Next in thread: Robert DeVito: "RE: DLSW MAC ADDR Filtering and Masks"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:31 GMT-3