From: Cameron, John (johcamer@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 11:17:28 GMT-3
I'm using a 11.3 version and have consistently had the same results. Is
Caslow wrong when he stated that Inverse Arp for a specific DLCI gets
disable after a reload if you have the same DLCI mapped in a FR map
statement?
JC
C i s c o S y s t e m s John Cameron
Network Engineer
Research Triangle Park
|| || Cisco Systems, Inc.
|| ||
|||| ||||
..:||||||:..:||||||:..
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Masraum [mailto:masraum@swbell.net]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 12:35 AM
To: Nigel Taylor; CCIE_Lab Group Study; Cisco Group Study
Cc: Bryant Andrews
Subject: RE: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
That is weird. I've never seen it happen before, I would bet it's a
12.1
thing.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Nigel Taylor
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 11:10 PM
To: CCIE_Lab Group Study; Cisco Group Study; Stephen Masraum
Cc: Bryant Andrews
Subject: Re: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
Stephen,
Yep, that's exactly that happened. Here's the important
config stuff...
Here's the layout..
I've got the typical hub and spoke topology frame cloud. I've got all 4
devices
using physical and using Inverse-Arp to dynamically activate the PVC's.
here's the
pertinent configs..... I ran through this a couple more times with the
same
result...in some
instances it took a while but Inverse-Arp eventually worked.
HUB router...running 12.1.4 code..
interface Serial1
ip address 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
r2_01#sh frame map
Serial1 (up): ip 172.16.10.2 dlci 201(0xC9,0x3090), dynamic,
broadcast,
IETF, status defined, active
Serial1 (up): ip 172.16.10.3 dlci 301(0x12D,0x48D0), dynamic,
broadcast,
IETF, status defined, active
Serial1 (up): ip 172.16.10.4 dlci 401(0x191,0x6410), dynamic,
broadcast,
IETF, status defined, active
Spoke 1.. running 11.3(11a)T1
interface Serial1
ip address 172.16.10.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
frame-relay map ip 172.16.10.4 102
r4_02c#sh fram map
Serial1 (up): ip 172.16.10.1 dlci 102(0x66,0x1860), dynamic,
broadcast,
IETF, status defined, active
Serial1 (up): ip 172.16.10.4 dlci 102(0x66,0x1860), static,
IETF, status defined, active
Spoke 2.....running 11.3(11a)T1
interface Serial0
ip address 172.16.10.4 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map ip 172.16.10.2 104
frame-relay map ip 172.16.10.3 104
!
r1_fs#sh fram map
Serial0 (up): ip 172.16.10.1 dlci 104(0x68,0x1880), dynamic,
broadcast,, status defined, active
Serial0 (up): ip 172.16.10.2 dlci 104(0x68,0x1880), static,
CISCO, status defined, active
Serial0 (up): ip 172.16.10.3 dlci 104(0x68,0x1880), static,
CISCO, status defined, active
Anyone got any IOS bug reports on this one...?
Nigel.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:30 GMT-3