Re: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?

From: Samuel Camarda (scamarda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 00:23:48 GMT-3


   
Sorry, missed replying to the group on this one...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Samuel Camarda" <scamarda@bellsouth.net>
To: "Nigel Taylor" <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?

> Do you have Active unused PVC's on these interfaces? I ran in to the same
> issue a few weeks back and found I was dynamically learning the addresses
> from the unused PVC's that were between the routers. To explain - I had a
> hub and spoke scenario that connected R2-R4 back to the hub R1. My frame
> switch was configured in a full mesh environment even though I was only
> using the PVC back to R1. The remotes were using the main interface and I
> had a frame map statements on each side that pointed to R1/Remote DLCI.
If
> I did a show frame map I saw the dynamic and the static. Same thing even
> after a reboot. I ended up taking the unused DLCIs off of the main
> interface and putting them on a disabled Sub-I. After that I stopped
> learning the addresses dynamically.
>
> Don't know if this helps but my problem was centered around having extra
> Active though unused DLCI's on my physical interface.
>
> Sam
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nigel Taylor" <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com>
> To: "Cisco Group Study" <cisco@groupstudy.com>; "Chuck Larrieu"
> <chuck@cl.cncdsl.com>; "CCIE_Lab Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 8:47 PM
> Subject: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
>
>
> > Hi All,
> > I was working through a number of frame relay lab and made =
> > some pretty cool observations. The big one being that I had Inverse-Arp
=
> > working as well while using the "frame-map" command. Everything I know
=
> > tells me this shouldn't be but it works.
> > I reloaded the routers and the Inverse arp worked. Even after shutting =
> > down the interface and bringing it back up the Inverse-Arp still worked.
=
> > =20
> >
> > Anyone got any thoughts on how this could be working....?
> >
> > Nigel...
> >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:29 GMT-3