Re: ISIS over frame-relay troubles.....

From: Nigel Taylor (nigel_taylor@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jan 13 2001 - 01:08:22 GMT-3


   
Eric,
     Well in the example I'm working on there's 3 routers on the same
ethenrnet segment. I'm trying if possible to keep them all on the same
broadcast segment. This would mean I would have to stand-up 2 tunnels on
each device to support what I'm trying to do. This seems to be quickly
becoming a configuration nightmare...Exactly how much ISIS is on the lab..
:-)

It's worth a try...

Nigel..

>From: "Eric Fairfield" <ericfair@chorus.net>
>To: "Nigel Taylor" <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com>, "Cisco Group Study"
><cisco@groupstudy.com>, "CCIE_Lab Group Study"
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: ISIS over frame-relay troubles.....
>Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:04:25 -0600
>
>If using a multipoint FR interface IS-IS will not work. Create a tunnel
>between the two routers. Works for me!
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Nigel Taylor <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com>
>To: Cisco Group Study <cisco@groupstudy.com>; CCIE_Lab Group Study
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 3:11 AM
>Subject: ISIS over frame-relay troubles.....
>
>
> > Hi All,
> > I'm just trying to get a handle on ISIS over frame relay. It
>=
> > would seem that because there's no comparable command to the "ip ospf =
> > network" under ISIS that this limits the configuration options over =
> > frame-relay. It's noted that cisco serial interface with frame-relay =
> > encapsulation defaults to a multi-point interface. For some reason I =
> > can't get ISIS neighbor adjacencies being formed using a full mesh =
> > frame-relay cloud.=20
> >
> > I'm using the configuration example in Doyle's Routing TCP/IP, pg. 652.
>=
> > I replaced the ethernet segment between the L2 devices(London, Rome, and
>=
> > Brussels) with frame-relay. In my frame-relay configurations I'm able =
> > to ping all points of the cloud but I'm unable to get adjacencies to =
> > form. All routers are configured with physical interface(multi-point, =
> > being the default) but I still get encapsulation failure when observing
>=
> > the "debug isis adj-packets". Now I've got this to work when the =
> > devices are configured using point-to-point sub-interfaces in a partial
>=
> > mesh(hub and spoke topology) and the hub configured for individual =
> > p-t-p's for each pvc.
> >
> > I am however trying to simulate the ethernet segment I'm replacing.. I'm
>=
> > I thinking way "out the box" here or is this possible"
> >
> > For reference there's a basic example on pg. 678 of Doyle's book that =
> > covers the frame-relay issue I'm trying to resolve...
> >
> >
> > Thanks All,
> >
> > Nigel.
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:28 GMT-3