RE: RIPv2/EIGRP thru tunnel

From: Ronnie Royston (RonnieR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 19:30:19 GMT-3


   
First, Kevin,

Router(config-router)#default passive ?
  FastEthernet FastEthernet IEEE 802.3
  Loopback Loopback interface
  Null Null interface
  Serial Serial
  Tunnel Tunnel interface
  default Suppress routing updates on all interfaces
  <cr>

Router(config-router)#default passive

Next, Glen,

I find it strange that he would want to advertise only loopbacks via EIGRP
or RIPv2. Don't you think there would be a local interface addressed with
some outside network that he'd like to tunnel routing protocols for? Say,
an ethernet, for example, serial or token ring, whatever.

Yea, he wanted to tunnel through an OSPF network. So, if there was no
interface besides the tunnel that he did not want OSPF to see, then why
tunnel in the first place? Why not just assign the network to the existing
OSPF process?

You guys be dissin my config. TCP/IP, all the way to the bank! Modular
chassis rule! biaaattchh.

Excuse me, too much Starbucks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Baumgartner [mailto:kbaumgar@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 2:19 PM
To: Ronnie Royston; 'Vikas Gupta'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: RIPv2/EIGRP thru tunnel

So what does "default passive default" do? I am familiar with passive
interface.
Is it related to this?

  Also why do you need to do

no pass lo0
no pass e0

Is this not the default anyway?

Sorry I am just a little confused with what you are doing with these three
commands?

  Kevin

At 04:04 PM 1/11/01 -0600, Ronnie Royston wrote:
>Insurance. That's just my way. I like have the routing protocol advertise
>out interfaces that I specify only. In this isolated senario, it doesn't
>make a difference.
>
>...just habit (and a good one, I believe).
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kevin Baumgartner [mailto:kbaumgar@cisco.com]
>Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 1:51 PM
>To: Ronnie Royston; 'Vikas Gupta'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: RIPv2/EIGRP thru tunnel
>
>
>At 03:21 PM 1/11/01 -0600, Ronnie Royston wrote:
>
> >There a few ways to do it, but here's one.
> >
> >R1:
> >int lo0
> >ip addres 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
> >!
> >int tu0
> >ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255
> >tunnel source lo0
> >tunnel dest 2.2.2.2
> >!
> >router eigrp 10
> >network 1.1.1.1
> >network 3.3.3.3
> >network (local ethernet)
> >default passive default
> >no pass lo0
> >no pass e0
>
> So why the need for
>
> default passive default
> no pass lo0
> no pass e0
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:27 GMT-3