From: Ronnie Royston (RonnieR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 19:04:38 GMT-3
Insurance. That's just my way. I like have the routing protocol advertise
out interfaces that I specify only. In this isolated senario, it doesn't
make a difference.
...just habit (and a good one, I believe).
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Baumgartner [mailto:kbaumgar@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 1:51 PM
To: Ronnie Royston; 'Vikas Gupta'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: RIPv2/EIGRP thru tunnel
At 03:21 PM 1/11/01 -0600, Ronnie Royston wrote:
>There a few ways to do it, but here's one.
>
>R1:
>int lo0
>ip addres 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
>!
>int tu0
>ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255
>tunnel source lo0
>tunnel dest 2.2.2.2
>!
>router eigrp 10
>network 1.1.1.1
>network 3.3.3.3
>network (local ethernet)
>default passive default
>no pass lo0
>no pass e0
So why the need for
default passive default
no pass lo0
no pass e0
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:27 GMT-3