From: John Kim (albugkim@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jan 10 2001 - 18:50:18 GMT-3
The network statement for 130.1.0.0 should be network 130.1.1.0 mask
255.255.255.0.
John Kim
>From: Lykourgiotis Paraskevas <ParaskevasL@pcsystems.gr>
>Reply-To: Lykourgiotis Paraskevas <ParaskevasL@pcsystems.gr>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: BGP auto-summary and aggregate-address
>Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:09:58 +0200
>
>I think it has the answer is clalssless addressing. Look at following
>results
>Note that 131.0.0.0 is not advertised
>
>
>#show run
>interface Loopback100
> ip address 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
>!
>interface Loopback101
> ip address 131.1.1.1 255.255.0.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
>!
>router bgp 2
> network 13.0.0.0
> network 130.1.0.0
> network 131.1.0.0
> aggregate-address 130.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 summary-only
> aggregate-address 131.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 summary-only
> neighbor 172.1.17.10 remote-as 1
> no auto-summary
>!
>r3#sh ip bgp
>BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 131.1.1.1
>Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
>internal
>Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>
> Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
>*> 11.0.0.0 172.1.17.10 0 1 i
>*> 13.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
>*> 131.0.0.0/8 0.0.0.0 32768 i
>s> 131.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
>-----Original Message-----
>From: YJC [mailto:stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 3:54 AM
>To: Lykourgiotis Paraskevas; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: BGP auto-summary and aggregate-address
>
>
>do you try aggregate-address to classless address.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Lykourgiotis Paraskevas <ParaskevasL@pcsystems.gr>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 10:48 PM
>Subject: BGP auto-summary and aggregate-address
>
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have noticed that if no auto-summary is configured under bgp then
> > aggregate addresses are also suppressed.
> > Do you know if it is possible to turn off auto-summarization without
> > suppressing aggregate addresses?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:26 GMT-3