Re: DLSW ICANREACH can and non can addressing

From: Atif Awan (atifawan@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:38:17 GMT-3


   

For both ethernet and token ring on a single router you will need to run
both SR/TLB as well as DLSw.

>From: Shaun Nicholson <Shaun.Nicholson@kp.org>
>To: atifawan <atifawan@hotmail.com>
>CC: ccielab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: DLSW ICANREACH can and non can addressing
>Date: 08 Jan 2001 07:09:12 -0800
>
>Are you sure about that?
>Think about the following.......
>What if I have a router with both a TR and an Eth interface on it and both
>are running DLSW how does it know where my ICANREACH comes from or how do I
>know what to use address wise to enter it correctly as an ICANREACH ?
>
>
>Shaun
>
>
>
>
>atifawan@hotmail.com on 01/08/2001 09:53:00 AM
>To: Shaun Nicholson, ccielab@groupstudy.com@Internet
>cc:
>Subject: Re: DLSW ICANREACH can and non can addressing
>
>
>If you have DLSw configured it automatically takes care of the address
>translation.
>
>Regards
>Atif
>
> >From: Shaun Nicholson <Shaun.Nicholson@kp.org>
> >Reply-To: Shaun Nicholson <Shaun.Nicholson@kp.org>
> >To: ccielab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: DLSW ICANREACH can and non can addressing
> >Date: 08 Jan 2001 06:27:48 -0800
> >
> >OK
> >I've got the when to use can to non can off to a T.
> >You use it on ethernet when advertizing to tokenring yeah.
> >
> >But lets say you want to advertize a station thats on ethernet mac
>address
> >1111.1111.1111 and you have a few dlsw peers of both ethernet and token
> >ring.
> >
> >Would you do this
> >dlsw icanreach 1111.1111.1111
> >dlsw icanreach 8888.8888.8888
> >
> >so that both TR and Eth can reach the host?
> >
> >Thanks
> >Shaun
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:24 GMT-3