From: Tyler Pomerhn (tpomerhn@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:10:13 GMT-3
I prefer using both. Loopbacks are too damned useful for things like BGP
peering, etc...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Chuck Church
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 9:55 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: ospf router-id (error in doc)
>
>
> All,
>
> I meant to post about this earlier. In the lab, what would be better
> to use, loopbacks or just the router-id? In a production network, I'd lean
> towards the loopback since it's pingable, but in the lab, I'd hate to lose
> points because my loopback wasn't pingable or had created another host
> route. Any preference?
>
> Chuck Church
> CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE
> Sr. Network Engineer
> Magnacom Technologies
> 140 N. Rt. 303
> Valley Cottage, NY 10989
> 845-267-4000 x218
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Hescock [mailto:bhescock@cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 9:48 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: ospf router-id (error in doc)
>
>
> fyi: documentation bug CSCdt12293 has been filed to correct univercd
> so it doesn't say the ospf router-id command came out in 10.0. They'll
> verify what version it actually came out in (around 12.0(7)) and will
> make the change.
>
> Brian
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:24 GMT-3