RE: When is it appropriate to to apply mac addr conversion?

From: Ronnie Royston (RonnieR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jan 05 2001 - 11:55:53 GMT-3


   
No. DLSW will take care of the conversion. A router locally bridging e-net
to token will have to be manually configured to translate.

I believe that you should be concerned with bit-swapping when you are using
mac filters on local interfaces. I understand that you write mac access
list canonically on INbound for e-net, non-canonical for INbound token ring.
When filtering outbound, you'll filter will have to be bit-swapped.

Anyone else have something to say about this? I'd like some feedback as
well. Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Curtis Phillips [mailto:phillipscurtis@netscape.net]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 6:08 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: When is it appropriate to to apply mac addr conversion?

When dealing with DLSW between routers having ethernet and token-ring
segments
attached while filtering mac addresses is it appropriate to
consider mac canonical -to - non-canonical conversions as part of your
configuration?

As the translational bridging is integrated into the protocol itself. Can
someone provide a brief explanation and perhaps and example?

In appreciation,

Curtis



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:22 GMT-3