Re: DLSW mac-exclusive remote / Does the mac need to be bit swapped if remote is a TR ?

From: YJC (stiff.yu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 04 2001 - 06:10:57 GMT-3


   
hu,

I know if I use command"dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive on router 2, then R1
only can access mac addrss 4444.4444.4444, but what happen if i use command
dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive remote on router 2?

regards
----- Original Message -----
From: Wayne Hu <wayneccie@yahoo.com>
To: Padhu (LFG) <padhu@steinroe.com>; 'Wayne Hu' <wayneccie@yahoo.com>; John
Doe <lab_help@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 1:52 AM
Subject: RE: DLSW mac-exclusive remote / Does the mac need to be bit swapped
if remote is a TR ?

> answer your question 1:
> on router 2, if you put the command dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive, then R1
> only can access mac addrss 4444.4444.4444, otherwise R1 can access all
> mac-address.
>
> answer your question 2:
> only ethernet address need to be bit swapped, you don't need do bit
swaping
> for TR station.
> Station1-------Ethernet----------R1----------------R2------Token
> ring---------Station2
> if i canreach mac-address put on R2 to let Station1 access station2, you
> don't need bit swapping.
> if i canreach mac-address put on R1 to let Station2 access station1, you
do
> need bit swapping.
>
>
> CMIIW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Padhu (LFG)
> Sent: January 3, 2001 11:54 AM
> To: 'Wayne Hu'; John Doe; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: DLSW mac-exclusive remote / Does the mac need to be bit swapped
> if remote is a TR ?
>
>
> If i understand it right, if u do NOT want the explorers to be sent,
> (explorers are sent when the reachability info is not available in
> cache),then
> u can do dlsw i canreach mac-address 4444.4444.4444 on the 10.1.1.2
> router-2.
> this would be pushed to the downstream dlsw peer .
>
> question related to the same topic :
>
> 1. If i use dlsw i canreach mac-exclusive 4444.4444.4444 on the 10.1.1.2,
> then R1 can reach ONLY 4444.4444.4444 . Right ? I don't understand how the
> keyword
> remote fixes this by allowing other macs too..Can someone explains pls ?
> dlsw i canreach mac-exclusive 4444.4444.4444 remote
>
> 2. if the remote end station that needs to be reached is TR station
,should
> the
> dlsw i canreach mac-address be bit swapped for the ethernet peer
> downstream
> to recognise?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wayne Hu [mailto:wayneccie@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 10:53 AM
> To: John Doe; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: dlsw filtering
>
>
> Will this work?
> on Router one
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.1
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.1.2 dmac-output-list 701
> access-list 701 deny 4444.4444.4444 0000.0000.0000
> access-list 701 permit 0000.0000.0000 ffff.ffff.ffff
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> John Doe
> Sent: January 3, 2001 10:55 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: dlsw filtering
>
>
> How can I stop Router ONE from sending explorer
> packets to Router TWO looking for MAC address
> 4444.4444.4444?
>
> Please email me directly.
>
> John
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:22 GMT-3