From: watsonf (watsonf@xxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Dec 29 2000 - 12:49:19 GMT-3
I don't think anyone going into the lab should go in with this assumption,
unless you like looking things up last minute on the CD.
Fred Watson
CCIE #6561
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave" <cisco_instructor@genton.com>
To: "Johnson, Charles" <Charles.Johnson@turner.com>; "Ellington, Chris,
BmS - NMI-CK" <Chris.Ellington@bmsus.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 4:46 AM
Subject: Re: 3920 Switch
> I agree with that, but it is not needed in the lab. Only one BRF is
> required, with multiple CRF's, for each ring. Frames will not get
forwarded
> to the BRF unless the RII is set to one with a RIF present anyways, and we
> are forwarding to the vring for DLSw in the lab..
>
> DAve
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Johnson, Charles" <Charles.Johnson@turner.com>
> To: "Ellington, Chris, BmS - NMI-CK" <Chris.Ellington@bmsus.com>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 9:34 AM
> Subject: RE: 3920 Switch
>
>
> > As far as I can tell, if you need two separate rings, like you would get
> with two different MAUs, you would create two different BRFs and a child
CRF
> for each. Then a port associated with one CRF would have no connection to
a
> port associated with the other CRF, except through external connections
> (routers or other gear you attach).
> >
> > But I couldn't get enough TR gear to test it.
> >
> > charles
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ellington, Chris, BmS - NMI-CK [mailto:Chris.Ellington@bmsus.com]
> > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 8:48 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: 3920 Switch
> >
> >
> > What is the thinking if you have two rings (say ring 10 and ring 20) - I
> > suppose
> > it is best to configure two different CRFs and two different BRFs,
right?
> >
> > chris
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rob Webber [mailto:rwebber@callisma.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 11:31 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: 3920 Switch
> >
> >
> > I definitely agree with your VLAN assessment - unless multiple VLANs are
> > required, just use the default one.
> >
> > My plan (as you alluded) is to set the speed, duplex and mode (port or
> > station) on every port that I use. It is quite easy to do and the last
> thing
> > I want is to be questioning my Layer 1 stability. My experience with TR
> > autosense (with any product) has not been that good.
> >
> > Rob.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > Wang, Roger
> > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 11:07 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: 3920 Switch
> >
> >
> > I have been thinking about whether to configure the switch or not during
> the
> > exam... if it's asked, sure, but I don't see the reason why we can't
just
> > plug in the cables and go, except maybe making sure the speed/duplex
> setting
> > are correct. I know all ports fall into a default VLAN, just like on
the
> > Ethernet switches, so they should just work with minimal configuration.
> > What do you all think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rog
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dave [mailto:cisco_instructor@genton.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 10:48 AM
> > > To: Ronnie Royston; SherefMohamed@cdh.org; Santarsiero, Bill
> > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Re: 3920 Switch
> > >
> > >
> > > You must configure a BRF, and one or more CRF's depending on
> > > your topology.
> > > Then you must associate your physical ports to the
> > > appropriate CRf's, and of
> > > course move the CRF's in the correct BRF.
> > >
> > > dAve
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ronnie Royston" <RonnieR@globaldatasys.com>
> > > To: <SherefMohamed@cdh.org>; "Santarsiero, Bill"
> > > <BSantarsiero@greenwichtech.com>
> > > Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; <nobody@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 10:40 AM
> > > Subject: RE: 3920 Switch
> > >
> > >
> > > > That is not true. Don't sweat the 3920 switch. There is
> > > configuration
> > > > information on your DocCD. Read that beforehand. The most
> > > you'll be
> > > > configuring is vlans, I believe.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: SherefMohamed@cdh.org [mailto:SherefMohamed@cdh.org]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 7:27 AM
> > > > To: Santarsiero, Bill
> > > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: Re: 3920 Switch
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You are responsbile of configring everything in your rack !
> > > > If you don't know how to do it, you will fail misrebly .
> > > >
> > > > Good luck
> > > > Sheref
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Santarsiero, Bill"
> > > >
> > > > <BSantarsiero@greenwic To:
> > > > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > htech.com> cc:
> > > >
> > > > Sent by: Subject:
> > > 3920 Switch
> > > >
> > > > nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 12/28/2000 07:57 AM
> > > >
> > > > Please respond to
> > > >
> > > > "Santarsiero, Bill"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > I know the 3920 is on the equipment list, but is it
> > > configured for you in
> > > > RTP, or is this fair game for configuration. I just want to know if
> > > > someone
> > > > has had to configure it.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > Bill
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:13 GMT-3