From: fwells12 (fwells12@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Dec 28 2000 - 17:58:01 GMT-3
Thanks for your reply Earl.
192.168.8.0 0.0.63.255 area 2 is what I came up with by reading some basic
tutorials in Doyles book. It is working fine. I also used area 2 range
192.168.0.0 255.255.192.0 for inter-area summarization and it appears to
work OK.
I am experimenting with creating various IP addressing scenarios in an
effort to help me get OSPF down cold. The tutorials I have are sketchy at
best and I need to be able to blaze these configs out quickly without too
much thought. My goal is to come up with an addressing scheme for any
possible IP address range I get in the lab, that can be easily summarized
for redistribution etc. I want to be prepared in case I dont get a IP
add/mask combo that is easy to summarize...
I just created this one:
interface Loopback0
ip address 162.124.6.6 255.252.0.0
!
interface Loopback1
ip address 162.128.6.6 255.252.0.0
!
interface Loopback2
ip address 162.132.6.6 255.252.0.0
!
interface Loopback3
ip address 162.136.6.6 255.252.0.0
It is giving me a hard time. How would you deal with this ?
----- Original Message -----
From: Earl Aboytes <Earl@dnssystems.com>
To: 'Connary, Julie Ann' <jconnary@cisco.com>; fwells12
<fwells12@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 12:09 PM
Subject: RE: OSPF network statement
> I think this is the answer that you are looking for.
>
> Network 192.168.0.0 0.0.63.255 area 0
>
> This would put all networks 192.168.0.0 through 192.168.63.0 in area 0
>
> Watch out that you don't have any other conflicts. To be cautious I
always
> make separate entries and make sure that my masks match my wildcards.
>
> Earl Aboytes CCIE 6097
>
> PS. Sam@datastreet, if you read this post I want you to know that I think
> that it's pretty cool how involved you are in this CCIE thing. My dad
can't
> even remember the meaning of the four letters C-C-I-E.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Connary, Julie Ann [mailto:jconnary@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 11:51 AM
> To: fwells12
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: OSPF network statement
>
> Since each loopback interface will be a host route, use 4 network
> statements like:
>
> network 192.168.20.2 0.0.0.0 area X
>
> Julie Ann
>
> At 11:17 AM 12/28/2000 -0800, fwells12 wrote:
> >I have the following IP addresses configured as loopback interfaces on =
> >an OSPF router. What is the correct command to insert these networks =
> >into the OSPF process in the most efficient manner? By that, I mean =
> >conserving the maximum amount of IP addresses.
> >
> >interface Loopback0
> > ip address 192.168.20.2 255.255.248.0
> >!
> >interface Loopback1
> > ip address 192.168.28.2 255.255.248.0
> >!
> >interface Loopback2
> > ip address 192.168.36.2 255.255.248.0
> >!
> >interface Loopback3
> > ip address 192.168.44.2 255.255.248.0=20
> >
> >Cheers.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:12 GMT-3