From: fwells12 (fwells12@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Dec 28 2000 - 17:33:33 GMT-3
Could you explain your thoughts a little more please. I cannot see where
you get the 16 from. I came up with network 192.168.0.0 0.0.63.255 area 2
----- Original Message -----
From: Raymond May <raymay30@hotmail.com>
To: <fwells12@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: OSPF network statement
> If they will all be in the same area you can configure one network
statement.
>
> network 192.168.16.0 0.0.0.31 area X.X.X.X
>
> Brgds,
>
> Ray May
>
> >From: "fwells12" <fwells12@hotmail.com>
> >Reply-To: "fwells12" <fwells12@hotmail.com>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: OSPF network statement
> >Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:17:32 -0800
> >
> >I have the following IP addresses configured as loopback interfaces on =
> >an OSPF router. What is the correct command to insert these networks =
> >into the OSPF process in the most efficient manner? By that, I mean =
> >conserving the maximum amount of IP addresses.
> >
> >interface Loopback0
> > ip address 192.168.20.2 255.255.248.0
> >!
> >interface Loopback1
> > ip address 192.168.28.2 255.255.248.0
> >!
> >interface Loopback2
> > ip address 192.168.36.2 255.255.248.0
> >!
> >interface Loopback3
> > ip address 192.168.44.2 255.255.248.0=20
> >
> >Cheers.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:12 GMT-3