Re: Lab1 Question!

From: Raymond May (raymay30@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Dec 26 2000 - 21:02:02 GMT-3


   
Sorin,
     Yes step 11 was the hint given that you could NOT do any Layer 2 to
Layer 3 Mapping.

Best Regards,

Ray May

>From: "Sorin Suru" <sorin3177@hotmail.com>
>To: raymay30@hotmail.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Lab1 Question!
>Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 23:59:22 -0000
>
>Thank you for your help Ray. Please pardon my ignorance, but my English is
>not so good and maybe I didn't understand very well task#3. In my
>understanding you don't have to use policy routing if it weren't for step
>11 of task #3. Is that correct? Thank you kindly.
>Sorin
>
>
>>From: "Raymond May" <raymay30@hotmail.com>
>>Reply-To: "Raymond May" <raymay30@hotmail.com>
>>To: sorin3177@hotmail.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>Subject: Re: Lab1 Question!
>>Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 18:09:30 -0000
>>
>>Sorin,
>> I have done this Boot Camp lab and had no problems summarizing the
>>loopbacks. As per diagram Area 44 is connected to R4 which is only has
>>interfaces in Area 3. Therefore you must create virtual-link between Area
>>44
>>and Backbone.
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>
>>Ray May
>>
>> >From: "Sorin Suru" <sorin3177@hotmail.com>
>> >Reply-To: "Sorin Suru" <sorin3177@hotmail.com>
>> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >Subject: Lab1 Question!
>> >Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 05:43:18 -0000
>> >
>> >I m working on Lab1(bootcamp), my Question is regarding Task3.7
>>Summarize
>> >the 2 loopback subnets so they appear as one route to the rest of the
>>OSPF
>> >routers.
>> >To accomplish this OSPF area range command is used to summarize routes
>>from
>> >non-backbone areas into area 0 or for external routes(ASBR) the summary
>> >address will be used, please tell me why this theory doesn't apply to
>>this
>> >lab(I tried and doesn't work).
>> >
>> >From the HInts/LAB1 I understand that I need to use policy routing...any
>> >ideas? Is there a uRL with a detail explanation of these labs? Thank you
>> >and
>> >Happy Holidays.
>> >Sorin



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:10 GMT-3