From: Lykourgiotis Paraskevas (ParaskevasL@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Dec 20 2000 - 15:09:55 GMT-3
By saying host routes, I mean loopback interfaces with a mask of 32.
The configuration I am using is:
interface Loopback5
ip address 172.1.3.1 255.255.255.255
no ip directed-broadcast
!
router igrp 1
network 172.1.0.0
default-metric 1000 1000 255 1 1500
!
interface Serial0/0
ip address 172.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
So the advertisements for 172.1.3.1/32 are not advertised to S0/0 (deb ip
igrp trans).
If I use RIP, no problem.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:chuck@cl.cncdsl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 8:01 PM
To: Lykourgiotis Paraskevas
Subject: RE: IGRP host routes.
Host routes are static routes - by definition. /32's
If you were to redistribute static into IGRP my guess is no. classful nature
of IGRP would not accept a mask different that what is used in the IGRP
process. I can test this out at lunch time. The routers are on.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Lykourgiotis Paraskevas
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 9:38 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IGRP host routes.
Hi.
I want to ask something basic.
Does IGRP advertise host routes (in a non segmented network enviroronment)?
I think, in theory, host routes are advertised by the originator of the host
routes, at least.
In the same environment, if I turn to RIP, I have no problem.
TIA,
Paraskevas
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:08 GMT-3