From: Fred Ingham (fningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Dec 18 2000 - 12:22:24 GMT-3
What you say is true. Using cisco gdp irdb the lower priority is
preferred. Other hosts such as Sun Solaris conform to the RFC and the
higher priority is preferred (I don't have a Sun to test this out but I
believe it is true). If you see this on a lab, go by the RFC (or ask
the proctor).
Cheers, Fred.
Lauren_Dygowski@vanguard.com wrote:
>
> While the RFC says higher, in practical use with Cisco configuration the lowe
r
> priority number is going to be preferred.
>
> In this example, a router has no ip routing and global command ip gdp irdp an
d
> is on a segement with two routers running IRDP. Notice default gateway is fr
om
> the router with lower priority.
>
> router1#show ip ro
> Gateway Using Interval Priority Interface
> 172.16.78.1 IRDP 18 90 Ethernet2/2
> 172.16.78.2 IRDP 18 100 Ethernet2/2
> Default gateway is 172.16.78.1
>
> "Wu, Jiang" <wujiang@bj163.com> on 12/18/2000 07:17:50 AM
> Please respond to "Wu, Jiang" <wujiang@bj163.com>
>
> To: Arthayuth.B@datacraft-asia.com
> cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com (bcc: Lauren Dygowski/IT/VGI)
> Subject: Re: IRDP
>
> Router A should have higher preference value.
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1256.html
>
> Regards,
> Wu
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Arthayuth.B@datacraft-asia.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 7:42 PM
> Subject: IRDP
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I want to know what if I have 2 routers in same ethernet network. and I wan
t
> > router A is high priority than Router B for gateway without use hsrp.
> >
> > router A should have ip irdp vaule more or less than router B?
> >
> > =======================================================
> > Arthayuth Boonruengrod
> > Network Consultant
> > CIP, CCNA, CCDA
> > Datacraft (Thailand) Ltd.
> > *14th Floor, Lake Rajada Building, Ratchadaphisek Road, Khlong-Toey, Bangko
k
> > 10110
> > * arthayuth.b@datacraft-asia.com http:\\www.datacraft-asia.com
> > * (662)264-0400, 661-9368 Ext# 104 Fax: (662)264-0405, 661-9488 *
> > (661)684-8548
> > =======================================================
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:04 GMT-3