Re: bgp route-reflectors

From: Shaun Nicholson (Shaun.Nicholson@xxxxxx)
Date: Mon Dec 11 2000 - 15:36:12 GMT-3

• Next message: SherefMohamed@xxxxxxx: "Re: DDR Callback"
• Previous message: damien: "DDR Callback"
• Maybe in reply to: Rob Barton: "bgp route-reflectors"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
You need to give the reflectors a cluster id for the as to stop loops forming.

Shaub

robbarto@cisco.com on 12/10/2000 08:56:00 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com@Internet
cc: (bcc: Shaun Nicholson/MD/KAIPERM)
Subject: bgp route-reflectors

I am trying to configure two routers as route reflectors inside a single BGP
AS. Is it better to have all the routers in the AS peer to *both* route
reflectors, or would it be better to have the routers peer to just one
route-reflector? By making the routers peer to both route-reflectors, you
will get a measure of redundancy in your network, but I can't seem to get it
working like this. Any impressions on how to do this?

Thanks, Rob.

• Next message: SherefMohamed@xxxxxxx: "Re: DDR Callback"
• Previous message: damien: "DDR Callback"
• Maybe in reply to: Rob Barton: "bgp route-reflectors"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:01 GMT-3