From: zheng jiang gu (zjgu@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Dec 10 2000 - 00:18:46 GMT-3
I think add "bgp redistribute-internal " will be ok.
Not test it!!
----- Original Message -----
From: Ronnie Royston <RonnieR@globaldatasys.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 8:43 AM
Subject: BGP ----> OSPF
> I can't get a route from BGP into OSPF. The topology looks like:
>
> R2 R3
> \ / 172.16.4.0
> R7
> | 172.16.3.0
> R1
> | 172.16.6.0
> R4
>
> R2, 3, and 7 are running OSPF area 0. R7 and R1 are running iBGP, and R1
> and R4 are running IGRP. I got the R1-R4 link into R7's ip routing table w/
> BGP but when I redistribute BGP into OSPF, R2 and R3 have no information on
> the route in their OSPF databases. I have specified 'subnets' in the
> redistribution into OSPF. Does anyone know what I am missing?
>
> From R7:
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 7 subnets, 2 masks
> C 172.16.4.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0.2
> B 172.16.6.0/24 [200/0] via 172.16.3.2
> O 172.16.4.2/32 [110/64] via 172.16.4.2, Serial0.2
> O 172.16.4.3/32 [110/64] via 172.16.4.3, Serial0.2
> O IA 172.16.1.0/24 [110/65] via 172.16.4.2, Serial0.2
> O IA 172.16.2.0/24 [110/65] via 172.16.4.3, Serial0.2
> C 172.16.3.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0.3
> L7#sho run
> ***text omitted***
> !
> router ospf 7
> redistribute bgp 100 subnets route-map Only_6
> network 172.16.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> default-metric 60
> !
> router bgp 100
> no synchronization
> aggregate-address 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 summary-only
> aggregate-address 172.16.2.0 255.255.255.0 summary-only
> aggregate-address 172.16.4.0 255.255.255.0 summary-only
> redistribute ospf 7
> neighbor 172.16.3.2 remote-as 100
> neighbor 172.16.3.2 next-hop-self
> no auto-summary
> !
> !
> access-list 2 permit 172.16.6.0 0.0.0.255
> route-map Only_6 permit 10
> match ip address 2
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:00 GMT-3