From: Ronnie Royston (RonnieR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Dec 09 2000 - 15:04:37 GMT-3
Looks like the only way to do this is to map the ip address of the
non-connected remote router to the central router, e.g., 'frame map ip
3.4.7.19 104' where 104 points to the middle guy, 3.4.7.17. I couldn't get
route-maps to fix this.
R3(.18) R4(.19)
\ /
\ /
R7(3.4.7.17)
-----Original Message-----
From: zhangxianqi [mailto:xianqizhang@sina.com]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 7:35 PM
To: Ronnie Royston
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: An equivalent to NEXT_HOP_SELF for an IGP?
you can do it on redistribut use route-map,in the route-map,set next-hop.
I don't try it on my router,just from memory,sorry if i am wrong.
regards
xianqi
----- Original Message -----
From: Ronnie Royston <RonnieR@globaldatasys.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 8:22 AM
Subject: An equivalent to NEXT_HOP_SELF for an IGP?
> Is there a way to redistribute routes between IGPs in such a way as to set
> redistributed routes to point to this router as the next hop?
>
> I set up a lab where a multipoint subinterface is connecting R7 as below:
>
> R3 R4
> \ /
> \ /
> R7
>
> R7 shares OSPF area0 with R3 and speaks RIPv2 to R4 (passive interface
with
> neighbor command). R3 is getting the routes from RIP redistributed just
> fine and as expected, with R4's serial interface as the next hop.
However,
> routing fails because I only have R3 and R4 frame mapped to R7 and not
each
> other. I want to use a route-map in redistributing into OSPF to tell the
> OSPF routers to use R7s serial interface as the next hop for the routes
> learned via RIP. I can't get this to work. How should I resolve this,
or,
> is this a completely useless senario and there are no "knobs" to turn to
fix
> this? Thanks everyone.
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:00 GMT-3