From: Fred Ingham (fningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Dec 06 2000 - 23:03:54 GMT-3
I haven't done the lab but looking at your configuration:
The route map is only applied to the connected routes, not the routes
learned via OSPF.
The metrics are probably so you can tell the difference. The metrics
applied to the OSPF routes will have a larger cost than the route from
connected so if you have both, the connected route will be preferred.
IGRP only uses BW and delay by default.
HTH, Fred.
Piperw222@aol.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have 2 questions, #1. My understanding of the route map is that net
> 137.20.0.0 will be permitted into the redistribution to igrp but everything
> else will not... If this is so then why does router 1 include other routes
> coming in via ospf... My other question is. What kind of criteria is used to
> change the bandwidth when redistributing into igrp (connected - metric 10000
> 100 , redist ospf 1 metric 2000 200 ) in addition, why does the delay change
> as well.
>
> Thanks , any help will be appreciated
>
> Below is the partial config for router 2
>
> router ospf 1
> redistribute igrp 1 metric 100 metric-type 1 subnets tag 1
> network 137.20.20.1 0.0.0.0 area 2
> network 150.100.32.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> default-information originate always metric 100 metric-type 1
> area 2 virtual-link 11.1.1.1
> !
> router igrp 1
> redistribute connected metric 10000 100 255 1 1500 route-map filter-other
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 2000 200 255 1 1500
> network 150.200.0.0
> !
> ip classless
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 137.20.20.2
> !
> no logging console
> access-list 1 permit 137.20.0.0 0.0.255.255
> access-list 2 permit any
> route-map filter-other permit 10
> match ip address 1
> !
> route-map filter-other deny 20
> match ip address 2
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:59 GMT-3