Re: IPX Masks

From: Tony Olzak (aolzak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Dec 01 2000 - 12:50:37 GMT-3


   
   DJ,
   
   It's not a bit swap. That's a typo, should be "C" instead of "D". What
   you are doing is like in supernetting IP, you are moving the bits in
   the mask to the left to summarize a couple of networks. The networks
   0-3 can be made using the bits 0000, 0001, 0010, and 0011. Your
   original IPX mask in an IPX network is all ones, or FFFFFFFF. Move the
   bits two to the left to summarize the last two bits and you have
   FFFFFFFC, or 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1100. Note the last
   two bits are empty.
   
   Link this to IP for a better understanding. You have networks
   192.168.1.0/30, 192.168.1.4/30, 192.168.1.8/30, and 192.168.1.12/30.
   
   /30 is 252, or 11111100
   
   Use a network of 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.240 to summarize. The 240
   means 11110000. You've moved the bits two to the left to summarize
   0-15 (16 was your next network number).
   
   Do I hear any "AHH's" yet? =)
   
   Tony
   
   
   
   l Message -----
   
   From: D. J. Jones
   
   To: Tony Olzak
   
   Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 10:17 AM
   
   Subject: Re: IPX Masks
   
   Tony, I think I understand the second example you give for summarizing
   0-7 using FFFFFFF8, but I fail
   
   to understand the first example summarizing 0-3 using FFFFFFFD? Did
   you do a bit swap from
   
   0011 to 1100? If so, why would we not do a bit swap on the second
   example from 1000 to 0001?
   
   
   
   Thanks..dj
   
   ----- Original Message -----
   
   From: Tony Olzak
   
   To: damien ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
   
   Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 6:57 PM
   
   Subject: Re: IPX Masks
   
   This is a network summary mask that works just like a standard IP
   subnet mask. You just have to convert to binary to figure it out. The
   all "F"s means the equivalent of a /32 mask in IP.
   
   
   
   In your last nibble:
   
   
   
   0 = 0000
   
   1 = 0001
   
   2 = 0010
   
   3 = 0011
   
   4 = 0100
   
   5 = 0101
   
   
   
   In your scenario, since you only want to deny up to network 11110005,
   you can only summarize 0-3 in one statement. Otherwise you would
   summarize 0-7 in a single statement.
   
   
   
   Your statement would be:
   
   
   
   access-list 1200 deny 11110000 FFFFFFFD
   
   
   
   The "D" stands for "1100", which means you are summarizing networks
   0-3.
   
   
   
   If you wanted 0-7 you would need to use "1000", or FFFFFFF8 as the IPX
   mask.
   
   
   
   Tony
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   ----- Original Message -----
   
   From: damien
   
   To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
   
   Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:37 PM
   
   Subject: IPX Masks
   
   Can anyone explain how IPX Masks work with IPX access lists for NLSP
   redistribution and give some examples..............
   
   
   
   Just as an example, I had the following range of IPX Networks
   11110001....2....3...4 - 9 for example and I wanted to filter the
   first 5....other than extering the following 5 lines, is it possible
   with a single statement or at least less statements to do the same
   job........????
   
   
   
   access-lists 1200 deny 11110002 FFFFFFFF
   
   access-lists 1200deny 11110002 FFFFFFFF
   
   access-lists 1200 deny 11110002 FFFFFFFF
   
   access-lists 1200 deny 11110004 FFFFFFFF
   
   access-lists 1200 deny 11110005 FFFFFFFF
   
   
   
   Any good sources of info........................
   
   
   
   Thanks
   
   
   
   
   
   Damien
   
   
   
   "An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made,
   in a narrow field" - Niels Bohr
   
   
   
   



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:57 GMT-3