Re: IP NAT

From: Brian Hescock (bhescock@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Nov 05 2000 - 21:56:52 GMT-3


   
Fred,
   Cpu utilization really isn't an issue, memory is the key. Each
translation takes up 140 bytes.

Brian

On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, Fred wrote:

> Thanks to all of you who reply. As I dig more into this issue and
> testing, there is no way to map it static without manually entering
> everything, yes...line by line. What happen was that when a machine pop
> up into the network, it will pick up a next available IP to do the
> translation, so the only way is to put the entry into line by line. My
> second question regarding this issue is how much of CPU process will it
> eat up? You talking about a lot of lines that need to compare when
> packages arrive at the router.
>
> Fred
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:42 GMT-3