Re: PPP (dialer-group command)

From: Tony Olzak (aolzak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Nov 04 2000 - 03:49:57 GMT-3


   
Oops, I meant no string. You'll need the map to authenticate the received
call. Sorry.

Tony

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Olzak" <aolzak@buckeye-express.com>
To: "Steve McNutt" <lpd@jacksonville.net>; "z z" <ccie_99@yahoo.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 1:09 AM
Subject: Re: PPP (dialer-group command)

> Right. All you'll want to do on the called side is use dialer-group and
set
> all traffic as interesting. This way it won't end calls. The calling side
> will end the call and the called side won't be able to initiate a call
> because it has no dialer map or string (leave these off).
>
> Tony
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve McNutt" <lpd@jacksonville.net>
> To: "z z" <ccie_99@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 12:28 AM
> Subject: RE: PPP (dialer-group command)
>
>
> > becuase r2 has no interesting traffic defined he will always hang up
when
> > his idle timer expires, regardless of wether desireable traffic is
flowing
> > across the link. proabably not a good thing.
> >
> > There seems to be one exception to this, and that is dialer watch.
> somehow
> > it is able to tell the remote router to reset it's idle timer if the
> watched
> > route has not come back up. wonder what protocol they use to do that.
> CDP
> > maybe? I didnt play with it enough to really figure it out. maybe I
was
> > smokin crack and actually had a dialer group on the other end.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of z
> > z
> > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 11:05 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: PPP (dialer-group command)
> >
> >
> > Hi
> > Got one question about PPP.
> >
> > If we configure that only R1 can dial R2, do we need
> > to configure dialer-group/dialer-list on R2?
> >
> > If we configure so, R2 can disconnect the call.
> > However, is it necessary? It should be R1 to control
> > the connection. Am I right?
> >
> > thanks
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:41 GMT-3