From: Kevin Baumgartner (kbaumgar@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Nov 04 2000 - 01:05:20 GMT-3
I would say that "no static routes" only applies for routers since
the catalyst switches only have static routing.
Kevin
>
> Chuck,
> I have a bit confusion on the difference between "static route", "default rou
te" and "default gateway". If it is forbidden to use "default gateway", how can
I get attached to a cat5000's sc0 interface from a host on another subnetwork?
>
> Regards,
> Wu
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tony Olzak <aolzak@buckeye-express.com>
> To: Chuck Larrieu <chuck@cl.cncdsl.com>; Erick B. <erickbe@yahoo.com>; Cciela
b <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 10:10 AM
> Subject: Re: confusion on bridging
>
>
> > Chuck,
> >
> > The command "ip routing" is on by default and hidden from the configuration
.
> > Take two routers and configure them with just ip addresses. Then place a
> > loopback on R1. Place a default static route on R2 and ping the loopback on
> > R1. You will be able to ping successfully even though there are no routing
> > protocols running on R1.
> >
> >
> > Configs:
> >
> > R1
> > interface loopback 0
> > ip address 2.2.2.2
> > !
> > interface ethernet 0
> > ip address 1.1.1.1 255.0.0.0
> >
> > R2
> > interface ethernet 0
> > ip address 1.1.1.2 255.0.0.0
> >
> > You actually need to turn off IP routing in global config or in a bridge
> > command (IRB, etc.).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Chuck Larrieu" <chuck@cl.cncdsl.com>
> > To: "Erick B." <erickbe@yahoo.com>; "Ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 6:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: confusion on bridging
> >
> >
> > > How will it route ip if there are no static routes defined, or no routing
> > > protocol enabled, with networks placed into that routing process?
> > >
> > > I believe the show ip route will yield a "routing table" consisting of
> > > connected interfaces. Traffic will not "route" between devices. I.e
> > > forwarding will not take place.
> > >
> > > Am I wrong again?
> > >
> > > Chuck
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Erick B.
> > > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 2:49 PM
> > > To: David T. Absalom
> > > Cc: Ccielab
> > > Subject: Re: confusion on bridging
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > >
> > > It'll route IP and bridge everything else if you have
> > > a IP address assigned to the interface and don't have
> > > 'no ip routing' globally.
> > >
> > > --- "David T. Absalom" <dabsalom@lucent.com> wrote:
> > > > I'm confused (nothing new...)
> > > >
> > > > If an interface is in a bridge group but has an ip
> > > > address and the "no ip
> > > > routing" statement has NOT been issued
> > > > (additionally, no crb or irb), will
> > > > it route or bridge. Is ip routing on by default
> > > > when an ip address is added
> > > > to an interface?
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:41 GMT-3