From: radha rani (radhaccie@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Nov 03 2000 - 16:51:38 GMT-3
I can't seem to redistribute the secondary network into NLSP. Is this not
possible?
>From: "Sam Munzani" <sam@munzani.com>
>Reply-To: "Sam Munzani" <sam@munzani.com>
>To: "mark salmon" <masalmon@cisco.com>, "Scott Morris"
><smorris@mentortech.com>
>CC: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: IPX - multiple frame encapsulations on one wire
>Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 13:08:39 -0600
>
>I prefer subinterface because that's easy, works with NLSP as well. What if
>you are told not to use subinterface in lab? Give brain a little excercise.
>
>Sam
>
>
> > Update. With future releases, IPX secondary addresses will not be
> > supported. Practice using sub interfaces instead. Trust me.
> >
> > Scott Morris wrote:
> > >
> > > (config-if)ipx network (net) encapsulation (encap-type) secondary
> > >
> > > Enjoy!
> > >
> > > Scott Morris, MCSE, CNE(3.x), CCDP (R&S), CCIE (R&S) #4713, Security
> > > Specialization, CCNA - WAN Switching
> > > CCSI #21903
> > > smorris@mentortech.com
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > Mark Salmon
> > Network Support Engineer - SBC OP HQ
> > Cisco Systems Inc
> > 8735 W. Higgins Road Suite 300
> > Chicago IL 60631
> > Phone:773-695-8235
> > Pager:800-365-4578
> > email: masalmon@cisco.com
> > Empowering The Internet Generation.
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:41 GMT-3