Re: IPX - multiple frame encapsulations on one wire

From: mark salmon (masalmon@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Nov 03 2000 - 17:51:06 GMT-3

• Next message: Ellington, Chris, BmS - NMI-CK: "RE: San Jose hotel"
• Previous message: Sam Munzani: "Re: IPX - multiple frame encapsulations on one wire"
• Maybe in reply to: Ronnie Royston: "IPX - multiple frame encapsulations on one wire"
• Next in thread: mark salmon: "Re: IPX - multiple frame encapsulations on one wire"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Update. With future releases, IPX secondary addresses will not be
supported. Practice using sub interfaces instead. Trust me.

Scott Morris wrote:
>
> (config-if)ipx network (net) encapsulation (encap-type) secondary
>
> Enjoy!
>
> Scott Morris, MCSE, CNE(3.x), CCDP (R&S), CCIE (R&S) #4713, Security
> Specialization, CCNA - WAN Switching
> CCSI #21903
> smorris@mentortech.com

--
Mark Salmon
Network Support Engineer - SBC OP HQ
Cisco Systems Inc
8735 W. Higgins Road Suite 300
Chicago IL 60631
Phone:773-695-8235
Pager:800-365-4578
email: masalmon@cisco.com
Empowering The Internet Generation.

• Next message: Ellington, Chris, BmS - NMI-CK: "RE: San Jose hotel"
• Previous message: Sam Munzani: "Re: IPX - multiple frame encapsulations on one wire"
• Maybe in reply to: Ronnie Royston: "IPX - multiple frame encapsulations on one wire"
• Next in thread: mark salmon: "Re: IPX - multiple frame encapsulations on one wire"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:41 GMT-3