BGP and route-maps

From: Nnanna Obuba (obuba@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Oct 30 2000 - 11:23:35 GMT-3

• Next message: Jay Hennigan: "Re: PIX PPTP, no NAT"
• Previous message: bernard.moreon@xxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: ISDN driving me f*&&in mad"
• Next in thread: Chris McPeek: "RE: BGP and route-maps"
• Maybe reply: Chris McPeek: "RE: BGP and route-maps"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/15.html#A21.0

This BGP paper on the cisco website states that :

Route maps associated with the neighbor statement have
no affect on incoming updates when matching based on
the IP address:

I have always been able to filter incoming updates
using route-maps...indeed I have a working config as I
speak...Does any one have an explanation for this? Am
I misunderstanding something?

cheers

Nnanna

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/15.html#A21.0

• Next message: Jay Hennigan: "Re: PIX PPTP, no NAT"
• Previous message: bernard.moreon@xxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: ISDN driving me f*&&in mad"
• Next in thread: Chris McPeek: "RE: BGP and route-maps"
• Maybe reply: Chris McPeek: "RE: BGP and route-maps"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:32 GMT-3