From: John Conzone (jkconzone@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Oct 29 2000 - 10:21:36 GMT-3
Eric, I forgot to add that you can use the same endpoints if the tunnel
encap is different.
Sorry. Tunnel mode AURP and GRE can use same endpoints as encap is
different.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Fairfield" <ericfair@chorus.net>
To: "John Conzone" <jkconzone@home.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: tunnel
> Are you sure about this? I have done it before when I did a AURP tunnel
and
> an IPX tunnel. Seemed to work fine.
>
> Also, thanks for the reply on the DLSW peer situation. I looked at the
> dynamic peer but again like you stated if both have data you will have to
> peering connections. Back to grindstone!!! One week left.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Conzone <jkconzone@home.com>
> To: tom cheung <tkc9789@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 7:19 PM
> Subject: Re: tunnel
>
>
> > Multiple tunnels between the same 2 routers require different source
> and
> > destination interfaces on each router.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "tom cheung" <tkc9789@hotmail.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 8:01 PM
> > Subject: tunnel
> >
> >
> > > Does anybody know if I can use two different tunnels for the same end
> > points
> > > for two different protocols? I tried defining one tunnel for IPX
between
> A
> > > and B and another tunnel also between A & B for appletalk and didn't
> work.
> > > But worked fine with same configuration when the two protocols are
> > tunnelled
> > > through the same tunnel. Your comments are welcomed.
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:31 GMT-3