From: McNutt, Steve (Steve.McNutt@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Oct 24 2000 - 10:41:41 GMT-3
I've been getting flamed because apparently I did not communicate clearly in
my response to Derek's question. Before you fire off any more hate mail
please read the next two sentences:
I was trying to say that my questions to him were dumb, because they were
basic things that he probably already checked (which he had). I was not
accusing him of asking dumb questions.
I was apologizing in advance for asking him if he had checked the basics.
That's it.
I belive my message conveyed my meaning correctly according to the rules of
written english beecause I specified what "these" were in the same
paragraph, but looking at it now I can see that it doesn't read very well.
I just want to help people and be helped. Trust me, my ego has been checked
into the coatroom.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bert Kellerman [mailto:bertke@charter.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 12:47 AM
To: Steve McNutt
Cc: Derek Buelna
Subject: Re: bootcamp lab 3: bgp
Steve,
You suck.
Bert
Steve McNutt wrote:
>
> These are dumb questions and I hope you're not insulted, but have you
> verified that R3 and R4 have established adjacencies? have you checked to
> see whether R3 has sent any prefixes to R4?
>
> BTW, next-hop reachability and IGP synchronization would not be a relevant
> in this situation because R3 and R4 are talking EBGP.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Derek Buelna
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 8:55 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: bootcamp lab 3: bgp
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm apparently having some next hop reachability problems.
>
> I'm doing lab 3 and can't get r2's 137.20.20.0 route into the bgp table on
> r4.
> R3 see's it.
>
> Note that my configs are almost identical to the solution although I have
> experimented with next-hop self.
> R4 has all of the routes in his routing table. He can reach 100.1, 100.2
and
> 101.1.
>
> I'm confused. R3 has the route in his bgp table but he apparently isn't
> advertising the route to r4.
> I tried putting next-hop-self on the neighbor relationship between r3 and
r4
> so that there should be any next hop reach issues but he won't advertise
it?
>
> I'll send the configs if someone wants to look..
>
> -Derek
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:29 GMT-3