From: B Fridie (bfridie1@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:09:57 GMT-3
It does work now, it was a configuration error on my part. The tunnel
source on R1 was a loopback but the tunnel dest on R4 was pointing at
R1's serial interface. I assume if these don't match it won't work.
The strange thing is that the tunnel shows up even with the
misconfiguration, but you can't ping the IP on the far end of the
tunnel.
thx
----- Original Message -----
From: Earl Aboytes
To: 'B Fridie' ; 'cciemail'
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 4:36 PM
Subject: RE: sourcing tunnels
It is possible and should work. Make sure that your tagets are
reachable from both sides. In other words, make sure that each router
can ping eachother's loopbacks when sourced from the loopback. Also,
make sure that you are targeting the loopbacks on each side.
[cid:image001.gif@01C03CF6.128E2220]
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
B Fridie
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 1:01 PM
To: cciemail
Subject: sourcing tunnels
I have the following scenario I am trying and there's not much good
documentation on tunnels. Maybe somebody can help
R1-----------------------------R2
| |
| |
R3-----------------------------R4
I have a tunnel going from R1 to R4. I want to source the tunnel with
the loopbacks on R1 and R4 for redundancy. Is this possible? I can't
get it to work.
Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:29 GMT-3