From: tom cheung (tkc9789@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Oct 19 2000 - 23:31:29 GMT-3
But the lab exercise I'm working on behaves differently:
R8-----serial------R6----ethernet-----R5----serial----R1------r7
bgp1 bgp2, ospf bgp2 bgp3
ospf0 only ospf2
There're other routers not shown. But the question is why R8 is not getting
ospf routes redistributed into R6? (R5 is doing the redistribution.) Your
help is appreciated.
>From: Justin Menga <Justin.Menga@computerland.co.nz>
>To: 'tom cheung' <tkc9789@hotmail.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: bgp routing update
>Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:57:47 +1300
>
>Yes - that's the whole point of BGP - note that by default, these routes
>are
>NOT advertised to iBGP peers, but a good rule of thumb is that basically
>everything is advertised to eBGP peers.......
>
>Regards,
>
>Justin Menga MCSE+I CCNP CCSE ASE
>WAN Specialist
>Computerland New Zealand
>PO Box 3631, Auckland
>DDI: (+64) 9 360 4864 Mobile: (+64) 25 349 599
>mailto: justin.menga@computerland.co.nz
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: tom cheung [mailto:tkc9789@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, 20 October 2000 12:50 a.m.
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: bgp routing update
>
>
>This may sound like a stupid question, when two routers established an Ebgp
>session, and start exchanging route updates, do routes redistributed from
>igp into the bgp table get exchanged? For example, R1 and R2 are Ebgp
>peers, R2's igp routes are injected in R2's bgp table, will R1 normally see
>all these redisributed routes?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:28 GMT-3