From: David Goldsmith (dgoldsmi@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Oct 19 2000 - 17:55:51 GMT-3
Boris,
This link points to LAM (local area mobility) not mobile ip. They seem
similiar but not quite the same. I believe both solutions are based on the RFC
2002 - 2006
I believe the reason for this is because this link is speaking of making a
mobility area on one router.
LAM
http://www.cisco.com/cpropart/sync-src/ccstcp/cc/pd/iosw/ioft/lam/tech/lamso_wp
.htm
Mobile IP
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c/ip
cprt1/1cdmobip.htm
Dave
Boris Bertelsons wrote:
> David,
>
> I'm refering to the Command Reference of IOS 11.2
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios112/112cg_cr/5cb
> ook/5cip.htm#xtocid1083612
>
> Has the bridging any influence on the arp timeouts ? Don't think so. So why
> do they suggest it ?
>
> Regards,
> Boris
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]Im
> > Auftrag von
> > David Goldsmith
> > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2000 21:04
> > An: Boris Bertelsons
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Betreff: Re: Mobile IP
> >
> > Boris,
> >
> > What example are you looking at? I don't think there is any need for
> > bridging on moblie ip.
> >
> > Could you send the link.
> >
> > Dave G.
> >
> >
> > Boris Bertelsons wrote:
> >
> > > I have a question regarding mobile IP - IOS 11.2 :
> > >
> > > The examples on the Cisco Site state that one should configure
> > > Transparent Bridging on the interfaces taking part in mobile IP.
> > >
> > > What is the effort of doing so ?
> > >
> > > Any ideas ?
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Boris
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:28 GMT-3