From: Foster, Kristopher (KFoster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2000 - 17:12:56 GMT-3
Please remind me if this is the CCIE Study group mailing list or the NANOG
mailing list.. This is a valid question.
Kris,
-----Original Message-----
From: mark salmon [mailto:masalmon@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 2:57 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Summarization
This may be self evident but I suspect that it s highly unlikely that
you will have so many Class B addresses under you own domain unless you
are a huge ISP. The average (or even large) company will not have that
many so a summary address like that may not be practical.
My .02
Justin Menga wrote:
>
> This would cover from 160.0.0.0 thru to 175.255.255.255
>
> You could also use 160.0.0.0 11.255.255.255 - this would summarize
160.x.x.x
> -> 163.x.x.x and 170.x.x.x -> 173.x.x.x.........
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derek Buelna [mailto:dameon@aracnet.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 7:13 PM
> To: 'Marc Russell'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Summarization
>
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to figure out how to summarize 160.10.10.1/24, 161.10.10.1/24
> and 170.10.10.1/24 into one route.
>
> If I use the prefix 160.0.0.0 and mask it with 15.255.255.255, I was
> thinking that it would care about the first 4 bits and not care about the
> rest. Would that cover 160.0.0.0 through 175.254.254.254?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Derek
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:27 GMT-3