RE: Summarization

From: Simon Baxter (Simon.Baxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2000 - 04:28:55 GMT-3

• Next message: zhangxianqi: "ospf summary question"
• Previous message: Derek Buelna: "Summarization"
• Maybe in reply to: Derek Buelna: "Summarization"
• Next in thread: Justin Menga: "RE: Summarization"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
No, you're right.

160.0.0.0 15.255.255.255 would cover 160.0.0.0 through 175.255.255.255

-----Original Message-----
From: Derek Buelna [mailto:dameon@aracnet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 4:13 PM
To: 'Marc Russell'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Summarization

Hi,

I was trying to figure out how to summarize 160.10.10.1/24, 161.10.10.1/24
and 170.10.10.1/24 into one route.

If I use the prefix 160.0.0.0 and mask it with 15.255.255.255, I was
thinking that it would care about the first 4 bits and not care about the
rest. Would that cover 160.0.0.0 through 175.254.254.254?

Thanks,

-Derek

• Next message: zhangxianqi: "ospf summary question"
• Previous message: Derek Buelna: "Summarization"
• Maybe in reply to: Derek Buelna: "Summarization"
• Next in thread: Justin Menga: "RE: Summarization"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:27 GMT-3