From: Justin Menga (Justin.Menga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Oct 17 2000 - 01:25:10 GMT-3
Not sure on 1 or 3....
On 2, you wouldn't use DLSW as bridge group 2 and ring 1 are locally
attached. You would use SR/TLB.
Regards,
Justin Menga MCSE+I CCNP CCSE ASE
WAN Specialist
Computerland New Zealand
PO Box 3631, Auckland
DDI: (+64) 9 360 4864 Mobile: (+64) 25 349 599
mailto: justin.menga@computerland.co.nz
-----Original Message-----
From: z z [mailto:ccie_99@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 October 2000 1:07 a.m.
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: dlsw questions
Hi
Got three dlsw questions to ask.
1)RA config:
dlsw ring-list 1 rings 1
dlsw bgroup-list 1 bgroups 1
dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp 1.1.1.1
RA will use which interface to establish circuit with
1.1.1.1 ? ring 1 or bgroup 1?
2)
--ring 1--Ra----Rb------ring 2----
|
|bgroup 2
Ring 1 need dlsw with Ring 2 using TCP
Ring 1 need fst with Bgroup 2 using FST
How to configure this? is folowing correct? (Ra)
dlsw remote peer 0 tcp 1.1.1.1
dlsw remote peer 0 fst 1.1.1.1
3)do we need to configure vlans on the tokenring
switch in the lab?
regards
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:27 GMT-3