From: Tony Olzak (aolzak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Oct 13 2000 - 16:39:47 GMT-3
If you read the rest of the email, you would know that the original person
asked how to do it while being restricted from putting ip addresses directly
on the subinterfaces.
Tony
----- Original Message -----
From: "Asbjorn Hojmark" <Asbjorn@Hojmark.ORG>
To: "'Tony Olzak'" <aolzak@buckeye-express.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; "'Sheldon C. POpe'" <spope@cablespeed.com>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 3:01 PM
Subject: RE: ISL Trunking & Subinterfaces
> > R1
> > !
> > interface fastethernet0
> > no ip address
> > no shutdown
> > !
> > interface fastethernet0.1
> > encaps isl 100
> > bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface fastethernet0.2
> > encaps isl 200
> > bridge-group 2
> > !
> > interface bvi 1
> > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > interface bvi 2
> > ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > bridge irb
> > bridge 1 protocol ieee
> > bridge 1 route ip
> > bridge 2 protocol ieee
> > bridge 2 route ip
> >
> > That should do the trick.
>
> Why are you using IRB in this particular setup?
>
> You could configure the ip addresses directly on the sub-
> interfaces and there's really no reason to do IRB if you
> don't plan on bridging the VLANs onto other interfaces.
>
> -A
> --
> Heroes: Vint Cerf & Bob Kahn, Leonard Kleinrock, Robert Metcalfe
> Links : http://www.hojmark.org/networking/
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:26 GMT-3